🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.